To those

who gave...

Square This!

transparency X vested interest in truth

I'm saying, let's make an issue out of the law being able to be read and by whom.

Erratum

by Jove.
My original intent was a myth take or Comity of Err ors?
From Err at'em to Parse is d'vine.

Comity

network is not a market force?

The Political Coverage? And the hazzards of change and interpreting the progress. Issa that right*?

* Dylan Ratigan stand in(Attorneys General) Toe to Toe [**]

[And The Ed Show: apples and oranges and cherries and pits, sour grapes and aged whine.(Sestak and Lincoln- to link.)

[**]square this: Mukasey's "...least bad case(...)You want to do something, we can find something for you."(with interpreting law and the constitution)[Or no coverage O'Rham a?)

Net Roots or Grass Tip Memo

We are not alone in thinking we have the solutions, but sometimes it takes enough information and expertise to get things done, let alone right. Frustration and fiat are not enough! And often the media serves both rather than fact. In fact, given the relationship between the media and some of the culprits, and an often said reliance on them for information, there is only more information that needs to be filtered or weeded out[**]. This applies to fixing the economic bubble in the stratosphere and the bathyspheric leak* in the our planet. Excuses are lame, but solutions might be unprecedented.
[update: two comments and reining link.]

*only a geographic reference(link) to the President's Press Conference
[**] it took me a while to catch this pun See Update Under Construction.

Con Text

in Context of the last 4 posts.
You are not alone... *[1]
Pre-Press Conference Post[2]
Failure is always(mid press conference comment)[3]
Post Conference Press Comment.[4]
[5-28-10 i.e. We are not alone in thinking... Update.][5]

[It cracked my up that I missed this pun [** "weeded out"]but I must "tend to my garden" or at least my more immediate material world.]

[Update Under Construction]
Friday 10-28-10 links and edit freak out
Please note that I have tried to be consistent and not edited down the road without indicating such. So I should make this log for the record as I can recall it now.

[KEY] [#'s 1 thru 5 #'s added, missing asterisk possibly(yes) in the link, with Bold for emphasis or highlight]
1 two comments and **know better(I-1098) and two labels
2 Matthews untouched
3 referenced in 5 lame?
4 same same? (untuouched, lame)
5 [update, see 1 (two comments), reining (Wall Street), asterisk (*)Press Conference(bathyspheric), bold link of day "fixing the economic bubble", local context (information)I-1098]

I think that should suffice as a roadmap to my own legend. Except for labels and caricatures.

Post Conference Press Comment

"Actions speak louder than words" is a paraphrase or press comment on the press conference* with which I agree.

* Updated Link & Huffington Post.

Failure is always

an ingredient of progress. Perfection is always a failure. (Overwhelming superiority and the best and brightest of intentions* aside.)

* parsing and puns or Pen Dull'em [**]aside there are important dynamics involved

[**] 5-29-10 Err at'm to my original swing

Pre-Press conference Post

Chris Matthews Gushing on the Appearances.
Yesterday, A and B. (Promethean Effort?)

You are not alone...

in not making much economic sense. There are always people who think they know better, it does not mean they have solutions to the problems. There is a case for change, but until there is enough, there are still the same solutions needed*. That is not to say there can't be too much. There can. And Obama isn't it. Too much change that is, but hopefully, incrementally just enough.

We must have a design with an intention, not just a bottom line that starts at the top. Those that see the deficit as the greatest problem and cutting spending as the simplest solution, should know better**, not that it influences their success or advice.

* proper investments(not just jobs) are needed along with top down reform of the "invisible hand" and "bubble" blowing; a tweaking or replacement of Keynesian economics.

** 5-28-10 the other Washington link and labels(I-1098)added.

Heads should roll...

in an administrative and executive sense. This is to light a "Ring of Fire" around the update of my last post, as Robert Kennedy Jr. is now guest on the Thom Hartmann Show. Not to mention a corporate death penalty.

An Outer Truman

His Inner FDR.

The Real Deal?

I've seen it happen time after time. When the Democratic candidate allows himself to be put on the defensive and starts apologizing for the New Deal and the fair Deal, and says he really doesn't believe in them, he is sure to lose. The people don't want a phony Democrat. If it's a choice between a genuine Republican, and a Republican in Democratic clothing, the people will choose the genuine article, every time; that is, they will take a Republican before they will a phony Democrat, and I don't want any phony Democratic candidates in this campaign.

Re: con text
[5-25-10 Say it is so, Joe!]
[And the tale of two leaks? President Obama, Please. Step on some throats! I think the administration should have some "anglers" and "philosphers". This is an obtuse reference to Cheney and Rumsfeld*, but what with the blame that the likes of Palin and Paul place on them, since we don't have "the one" in the White House, we may need a czar of rolling some heads. i.e. "get her done" or out the door types.]
* not in paticular a defense matter, but more on the Secretary of Infotainment front.

Go Left Young Man!

The Pre-Midterm Mandate: The Ed Effect!
Pragmatic Pen Dull Em?
Mass a Choose Its!
Randslide!

Just in! To which I have preemptively addressed in the form of a constitutional "Ctrl F" for "freedom" and "commerce" in that the answer is in the first amendment, if one is not a Utopian reader, it concludes with the freedom..."to petition the Government for a redress of grievances". i.e. Commerce is under the legislative article and "A Republic if you can keep it" and if one can preamble.

[Go West Young Man?]

Slippery Slope

and the Pragmatic Plumber(*), a metarhetorical reply.

(*)not exactly a (cf) or "Ctrl F" but a pun on a part of a navigation tool, the plumb line, not to mention the pendulum C3. Not to Pen Dull Em but thank you Betty** Boop.

** Oops! Becky Boop (under Pragmatic Link)

The Randslide?

I believe I must credit Sarah Palin for using this term. But Rand Paul must credit Rachel Maddow for giving him an even hand.

The Pre-Midterm Mandate: The Ed Effect Sometimes the Democrats ask too little.* I second Ed. And Stephanie Miller. Not to mention TeaParty of the Left?

There is a theory out there that slips my mind now, but if I have not recrafted it, mine is that the Republicans run down government and Democrats have an up hill battle.** Actually I just sharpened it a bit. But economically*** it is a serious theory, if you look at each of the past Democratic Presidents since Eisenhower. Each administration has had a lot to recover from, and have been progressively less timid in addressing the slide, yet increasingly needful of change. Careful change.

* my amendment to Sestak paraphrasing President Kennedy.
** and I don't mean the slippery tubbers(Cf)i.e. link and Ctrl F "tub"
*** Oh and my General(Mills) Eisenhower pun aside,(but not the inversion of the check mark), my theory actually covers the existence of the Democratic Party. I will simply say that since Vietnam there has only been Carter and Clinton while the Carter was not out of the shadow of debt he faced the energy crisis, Clinton failed to transcend the Reagan revolution. I think it hinges on the failure to understand Keynesian economics and the evolution of empires or power period.
[see comments presently three]

The Cantwell Effect

The Filibuster Derivatives Effect?

The Ed Effect!

I just heard Ed Schultz call it, The Pre-Midterm Mandate. He noted that he had mentioned it last night. Not having found it yet, I might add that when you consider the wave, the medium/the mess age, it is a case of divide and cover age. The frustrated are fleeing the muddle. The only call is to challenge the middle.

The Obama Effect?

The Specter Effect!
The Hartmann Effect?
Bottom Line? Not Devolution.

The President is a progressive that needs pushing or convincing while it might be just a hunch that it was more than just self preservation for Specter not to run to the right. I think history should look kindly on Specter to have fought for what he believed rather than go with the flow of Republicans. While Specter was always a crafty navigator of issues, I think that he would rather lose as a moderate than run as a revolutionary.
[This opinion does not rely** on a read of the first two links, while a scroll over of the rest may suffice to get a jist.]

[** nor certainly endorse or bother read]
[Just in! Thom Hartmann predicts Sestak for President in 2016! Not to mention my ironic endorsement of my 2nd link. Ironic in that, how can one believe an NRSC ad? It makes me endorse him, although I am not a Pennsylvanian.]

Many Key an ism?

Deepak Chopra[**]: On Profit Beck* and Duelism.(sp!)

*(sp!) I can't check all puns(or misspells)

[See comment and added footnotes: Manichean ]

[**] Deepak Chopra is in last segment.

Cropping the News?

The Daily Show Lewis Black cedes Beck.
The Colbert Report Colbert routes FOX.
Some weep what they so**.
Sow check* your crop.

*thanks to Casey Kasem
** and some misspell
[updates: 5-17-10 Commity(sp?!), Charlie Rich?, the Free*** Market?, Re;-)sources?(Comity Label added)]

*** non-value or non-prophet

The Comity Market

coNation [**] or Network?
Just noting MSNBC morning segment(8:30)* on Financial Regulation in congress and by congress.
[* 5-14-10] not exactly the link is the TODAY SHOW, but see Elizabeth Warren. (Yes Congress is to blame, but not both parties nor all members equally.) (Remember there are three branches of government, and even though we are off kilter, it is not just a vote 'em out, but who you vote out and in.) [BTW: there is a difference between the bailout and the stimulus, but much of the former was under the Bush administration, where given Republican involvement was better than pulling a finger out of the dike and flooding the ditch.]
[update 5-17-10 ** added and Comity label added.

** coNation Pun on definition and publication, not Colbert. See Legend;(sp?!)

Checking In:

The Nation's New 4mat? Yeah, that's the ticket!
Tangent? Or see can't, or inverse of a co-sign?* Even a google of Charle Pride** found same.

* pardon my trig, it was "water cooler" sourced.

** A metaphor for America, diplomacy and justice

[In balance not necessarily a relationship. The particulars are different but is seems that there is a two for one[***] style, Obama if you will, that works in different system. There are dimensional differences in the branches and partisanship of the way we have evolved from the British, that ironically may be 4shadowed in theTea Party/Brown wavering.]

*** sound words that do not necessarily cross the Red C or Atlantic. The more dimensions? The Paul/Sanders Fed Audit Bill, the Palin/Paul Tea Party gap, the Democrat/Liberal dialogue 4knot?
[see update: 5-17-10 Legend Label introduced with Comity expanded labeling. But see Ribble ** I was noting that Pride and Rich find the same tune under a google.]

Weigh In or Way Out?

This is just to note that I have not weighed in on Cheney's Putter, the Golf War Dis-aster(sp!). Nor might* I way out on the recent SCOTUS nomination.

* Normite(sp!) not applicable, but I have aster risked the hints...not exactly.

[We've come a long way Katy! Pardon the innuendo**, but from Oil welfare rich Alaska to VP candidate to BP and back, I mean really... ]

** seriously I allude to the three women from politician to journalist and potential jurist, but there is caveat of commity* in word play.) (Is there a commity* network?)

[No! I did not know that.] Hint: Johnny or Jay Walker?] SNL?

[update: Not exactly! Tangent or See Can't or just Penn Station?

*[5-17-10] spell check (sp?!) legend: as intended? OK! In this case, alright.
In other cases (sp!) as intended, (sp!?) maybe more than one intention?
aka: no pun intended, or was there? This is a long narrative to say I don't intend to correct the unintended misspell, as in other minds it may mean something. But my intention was to insert the caveat channel.

Axe not what you can

do to your country, but what your hatchet can do for you.
Cindi Lauper is like who?
Original: In Your End Oh?*
Butt up boom...

But seriously folks. God is mentioned once, in each/(either) of the two founding documents. Con text aside...( a big aside) A search of each document did not find Judeo-Christian, Christ, Jesus or Jews in either. This points directly to the mind play that is not based on the word.

* an alternative subtitle was lost, by Jove.

George had a hatchet and only nicked the tree in the likely fable. Lop her Oh Really? Wierd word play.

Again I found these links, after my Franklin and Adams references.[**]

[Original Emailed 5-7-10 sans opening line: Only slightly recrafted today with Post-Weak-End comments and link.]

[**] refers to earlier yet to be incorporated emails. Well actually there is a pre-Lob her Palin Franklin reference here last paragraph under security. [In a search for our freedoms as taken advantage of by terrorists, the proper link was hard to find. But it was lost and found under our freedoms.]

[Update: the first two links have expired. Found proxies.(Current Stand-Ins) Following them I also edit "each" to "either", for math and English sake. ]

Hierarchy of Hypocrisy

Hating to generalize I note my potential logical fallacy in the following. Nevertheless, between the 2nd amendment and the 14th amendment, there seems a hierarchy for some. From Right to Bear Arms to Citizenship Rights where does the 1st amendment fit in? (*)

A. There is no hierarchy in constitutional amendments.
B. There are Supreme Court rulings that influence their dynamics.
C. So many blogs are moot points. (GOTO 1st sentence)

Of course maybe my posts are just moot or problematic. Problematic in generalizing and leaping. Unfortunately you must read, to decide. In generalizing there may be some association between the authors of certain events but not necessarily relevant. In the above case I simply point to fact that removal of citizenship is being considered for some but not their guns, while free speech is an element that might be fringe but relative. Meanwhile in an earlier and adjacent thought, some of this new found legislative fury seem like WMD.** Weapons of Mass Distraction. It would seem that all this populist rancor is really keeping Homeland Securiy busy. And while I support all rights reasonably used, I cannot help but feel that it really is a burden on our security. A bit more responsible reporting and responsible associating might help, but then how one goes about that...almost makes me long for a unitary executive. BTW: the dot, dot, dot was a rhetorical segue or moot question.

My potential obtuseness was not an attempt to be excedingly careful***, yet the cause and effect might be anachronistic(i.e. flip-flopped). The links to previous word choices were not intentionally designed to be more than a search for my previous usage, but they do seem to bring up some previous associations which show the importance of the process and progress, not to mention providing hope.

(*) an alternative link.
(**) not that early: My first referencing of Weapon of Mass Distraction.
(***) but maybe an antidote to some talk show hosts that muddle the search for terrorist

[Oh, and I do not vouch for the legal analysis or terminology in my ABC's. And had not intended to close with the SCOTUS link when I set out. Let alone the less than inflammable association with security. But it does seem that it is wierd that flammable and moot have similar usage issues as does the roots or branches of Faust, let alone Devil's Advocates. But no, that is the legal process, not to mention political, and word and world modifying dynamics, or as I have stumbled out(or coined) "dymanics". I will conclude with the issue that there was some Beckian confusion in the topic of a National Prayer Day in regard to what was canceled and what is being fought and by whom. But the ideas which Thom Hartmann yesterday contrasted was a National Day of Reason to share and balance the National Day of Prayer. While I suggested a National Day of Faith. But would that be legal? Not without debate, moot and inflammable or not.]

Waiting in the Wings.

[Update: 5-6-10 Here**] This is to note that I have a few spots and comments under developement in draft. In particular something on the issue of news/web coverage (so called Journalism) and it's sometimes too fast pace or poorly prophetic & preemptive coverage.

Meanwhile I just read this and don't recall if I had linked it as a to read or saved for reference* or loose link.

* a look at my posting dates indicates the latter

P.S. The NYTimes of course has it's cynics, while I hope CSM doesn't need more critics.

[**]5-6-10 regards saved in draft(now posted) as wise move and error to be followed up.

53 Hours*

[POSTED 5-6-10: This item was saved in draft as noted, and it was a wise wing walk **. I am no longer puzzled but will draw more from draft, and leave leaking the tangents below.]
I am still puzzled about a CSM article.
Truly Horizons that need updating somewhere apparently and ironically.

P.S. my Wave Label has not been kept up(clearly) although the con text has advanced in other 4mats and meta4s.

* pun on "24 minutes" (yes I believe I heard that) but I am sure it was just a misspeak. Yet I am doing as they say**.

Sub Text: Hint Gulf Leak Submission?

Not to mention NBC ad re Fox: and Cheney's Gulf Golf/Gee Oh Me Try and Newtons Fig Tangent. Olbermann Pushed On NBC! Cussing The Riggers. Fig'N Calculus But it is more personal than that.
[Posted as is, date & time reflect first draft.]

This Old Post.

A License to Steal.
A License for Your Home
Papers please?
Cap and Trade or 1984?
Thinking of Selling Your Home?

PLEASE KNOCK THIS DOWN.
HEAR HERE!

FAUX CULTIAN?

Pop Culture [*] and big Do Do!

[Source threads: [A], [B].

[I should note that I have not even caught Mad Men or The Wire but they might be following us and I allude to the deeper threads, which just might hinge on the word reconstruction as much as deconstruction.]

[Hint: "PC" is a Beckian tangent(wisecrack or side crack), while "Do Do" is a mess age we are in and must "read" as "well/to do". P.S. not pronounced "doh, doh" but that is another tangent or non-dough dew.]
[P.S.2.0 my "original intent" was to avoid "a ribble", but it could be unavoidable without a revamping of Keynesian economics or at least an imparting of Try-Go-No Metrics.]

* Update 5-6-10 P.C. Explained see Hint link added under "Beckian".